Rsc_cc_c4cc01199f 3..6
نویسندگان
چکیده
The development of agents for selective modulation of protein– protein interactions (PPIs) constitutes a prominent goal in drug discovery and chemical biology. Since PPIs are often mediated by well defined secondary structural elements, a promising strategy in this area has involved the stabilization or mimicry of these motifs via compact molecular scaffolds. Reflecting their abundance in protein structures, a-helices are often encountered at the interface of protein–protein complexes. Accordingly, a number of strategies have been developed for stabilization of a-helical peptides, which include the use of hydrogen bond surrogates as well as of a variety of inter-side-chain linkages such as disulfide, lactam, thioether or triazole bridges, ‘hydrocarbon staples’, and cysteine cross-linking moieties. We recently reported strategies for the synthesis of macrocyclic organo-peptide hybrids (MOrPHs) via the chemoand regioselective ligation of bifunctional synthetic precursors to genetically encoded precursor polypeptides (e.g. Fig. 1A). A key feature of this new class of peptide-based macrocycles is their modular architecture, as given by the diverse non-peptidic and peptidic moieties amenable to incorporation into these scaffolds. As part of ongoing studies directed at evaluatingMOrPHs as disruptors of biomedically relevant PPIs, we were interested in assessing the potential of these macrocyclic scaffolds to accommodate, and possibly, stabilize a functional a-helical motif. In this work, we describe the successful implementation of this idea through the design and development of a-helical MOrPHs that can effectively disrupt the interaction between the tumor suppressor p53 and the oncoproteins HDM2 and HDMX. HDM2/X are implicated in the negative regulation of p53 activity and overexpression of these proteins has been linked to several malignancies. While dual inhibition of HDM2/X has emerged as a most promising strategy for anticancer therapy, small-molecule inhibitors of HDM2 typically fail to potently interfere with p53:HDMX interaction due to subtle differences in the p53 binding clefts of these protein homologs. These limitations make the development of dual HDM2/X inhibitors a topic of current interest. HDM2 and HMDX bind to the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 (p5315–29), which upon complex formation adopts a well defined a-helix. Thus, in addition to its biomedical relevance, these structural features have made the p53:HDM2 interaction an ideal test bed to probe strategies for a-helix stabilization and mimicry. Fig. 1 (A) MOrPH macrocyclization strategy and chemical structure of synthetic precursors (box) investigated in this study. (B) Crystal structure of HDM2:PMI complex (pdb 3EQS) and model of representative example of designer a-helical MOrPH (i/i + 10 peptide cyclization with SP8).
منابع مشابه
Additional file 5.xlsx
position -4 C50 C49 C48 C47 C46 C45 C44 C43 C42 C41 C40 C39 C38 C37 C36 C35 C34 C33 C32 C31 C30 C29 C28 C27 C26 C25 C24 C23 C22 C21 C20 C19 C18 C17 C16 C15 C14 C13 C12 C11 C10 C9 C8 C7 C6 C5 C4 C3 C2 C1 C0 C-index SD P-value mark A 5 7 9 1 8 4 6 2 1 4 8 7 6 9 3 4 3 7 15 10 6 6 9 3 2 5 3 6 8 9 6 3 5 7 7 10 4 7 7 8 5 5 8 2 2 3 1 2 5 5 9 0.618 0.317 8.27E-03 n.s. A C 3 1 2 0 2 3 3 1 1 2 1 7 4 9 1 ...
متن کاملSupplement to Internally 4-connected projective-planar graphs
A5 = {{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4}, {1, 5}, {2, 3}, {2, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 4}, {3, 5}, {4, 5}, {6, 7}, {6, 8}, {6, 9}, {6, 10}, {7, 8}, {7, 9}, {7, 10}, {8, 9}, {8, 10}, {9, 10}} C11 = {{1, 2}, {1, 3}, {1, 4}, {1, 5}, {2, 3}, {2, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 4}, {3, 5}, {4, 5}, {6, 9}, {6, 10}, {6, 11}, {7, 9}, {7, 10}, {7, 11}, {8, 9}, {8, 10}, {8, 11}} E42 = {{1, 4}, {1, 5}, {1, 6}, {2, 4}, {2, 5}, {2, 6}, {3, 4},...
متن کاملAntibiotic Susceptibility of Salmonellosis Pathogens
Results 2 1 ) -. $%%& 7 ) " . ( 4 $5 ( 6 *1 )%( & ( 6 + ) ( 3 6 ) " ( '3 6 ) ( (5 ' ( 6 *1 )%( $ ( 6 + ) 8 ( (5 6 2 1 ) -. '((& ) ( '3 93$' 6 *1 )%( -' ( 6 + ) 4 ( 3 4 $ ( 6 *1 )%( $ ( 6 + 2 1 ) '& $%%& 7 ) " $ ( 4 ' ( 6 *1 )%( ' ( 6 + ) 4 ( (5 ( '3 6 *1 )%( ( ('3 6 + ) " 4 ( $'3 6 ) 4 ( (5 ' ( 6 *1 )%( $ ( 6 + ) 8 ( (5 6 2 1 ) '. '((& 7 ) " ' ( 4 & ( 6 *1 )%( . ( 6 + ) 4 $ ( 4 ' ( 6 *1 )%( ' (...
متن کامل006 Luetic.p65
( )* +,+ . / -,0,1)*,2 1 * 3 4 5 26 7 (,) ( 5& / 8 ) ,6 ,26 1)* 8 ) 6 9 3 / 8 / (,) , ) 6 9 / ( ,8 )+ * % ,70 6,8 4 / . ( ) 6 ( , ) 8 8 +,4 . 8 +6 3,2 * ( 8)*,2 9 3, :6& 3 )*,/ ( / +,+ . / ( / -,8 3 0 )3,/ ) ( )* ( 7 , ,(,7 * 63 )*,2 (6 5 3 / + * ( / -,8 , +,) *, 0 365 * ) ( / ; 36 / ( ) 6 9 / 0 ) 6 * 6 % 6 ( )8, ) ,26 4 )*-/ 4 3, ) 6 9 3 / ),. / )* ) ( -,0& ,1)*,2 1 * + / )*, 3 0 0 / ,3 ),. / ...
متن کاملPolyacrylonitrile Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Composite Fibers
! " # $ @ %&' ( ) * " + , * -" + , " ( ) . / %0' " *1 ) ( # , 23 4 5 63 3"3 ) , 1 # 3 3 7 77 89* : ; 6 3 6 -" <=3) 3 1 4" + > " ( ) > * # 3 ) 61 *1 1 4 , 1 # > 1 9 ? 6 3# "63 ,@ AA $ 89* : %0' ( 3 44 66; *1 ) 4? 1 4 / 3 6 4 *#63 " 63 3"3 ) , 1 # " A7 A %&&' , 6 B B 6 6"== 3 4 # 3 C)) 1 ) ? > 6 1 8 D D D E$A: 3 1 6 1 4 3 5 1 C) ) 1 ) *1 3 ) 1 > 6 1 85 FE D D D A 4 5 FE D 7D D : *"== 3 3 > 1 9 ? ...
متن کامل